(PC) Taylor v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20242:24-cv-00773California796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-0773 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an Oregon state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) & (2). Plaintiff challenges a 2017 arrest by the Sacramento Police Department. Plaintiff’s claim appears to be untimely. For actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the court applies California’s “statute of limitations for personal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.