Ramos
(PC) Matthews v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENE RAYMOND MATTHEWS, III No. 1:22-cv-01508-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO PARTIES’
v.
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
S. RAMOS, et al. DISMISSAL
Defendants. (ECF No. 55) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 19, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 55.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing…