Ramos-Quiroz

Ramos-Quiroz v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20241:24-cv-00701California5,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

FOR PUBLICATION

No. 23-60C (Filed: June 13, 2024) )

CRISTOBAL RAMOS-QUIROZ )

(a/k/a Cristobal Varela), ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) )

UNITED STATES, )

) Defendant. ) Cristobal Ramos-Quiroz, La Jolla, CA, pro se. Daniel Bertoni, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

BONILLA, Judge. This case bears all the hallmarks of a tortuous law school exam spanning criminal law, immigration law, constitutional law, administrative law, family law, federal courts, appellate practice, torts, and, of course, civil procedure. Dating back to the 1990s, plaintiff Cristobal Ramos-Quiroz has experienced myriad aspects of the American judicial system at the federal, state, and local levels in both the criminal and civil arenas, as well as the executive branch’s immigration court system. He navigated these fora with mixed success, at times represented by counsel and intermittently appearing pro se. Mr. Ramos-Quiroz is back before this Court seeking monetary damages from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.