(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20242:18-cv-03049California886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION, Defendant. 16 This case is presently before the undersigned on remand from the Ninth Circuit. For the reasons that follow, the court construes plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 107 in part to be a motion to re-open discovery. So construed, the motion will be denied. Further, the court will set a schedule for supplemental briefing on remand. Plaintiff brought this discrimination and retaliation case against his employer, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), on November 26, 2018. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff identified four causes of action: (1) Breach of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16; (2) Retaliation in Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16; (3) Breach of California Govt. Code Section 12940,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.