(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION, Defendant. 16 This case is presently before the undersigned on remand from the Ninth Circuit. For the reasons that follow, the court construes plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 107 in part to be a motion to re-open discovery. So construed, the motion will be denied. Further, the court will set a schedule for supplemental briefing on remand. Plaintiff brought this discrimination and retaliation case against his employer, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), on November 26, 2018. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff identified four causes of action: (1) Breach of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16; (2) Retaliation in Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16; (3) Breach of California Govt. Code Section 12940,…