(PC)Hernandez

(PC)Hernandez v. Constable

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20242:19-cv-02195California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CESAR N. HERNANDEZ, Case No. 2:19-cv-2195 DJC DB P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 A. CONSTABLE, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties filed pretrial statements. (ECF Nos. 124, 127.) Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for discovery. (ECF No. 123.) For the reasons set forth below, this court will deny plaintiff’s motion and order defendants to confirm that they properly disclosed the experts identified in their pretrial statement to plaintiff. BACKGROUND In a Further Scheduling Order issued June 27, 2023, this court set deadlines of August 23, 2023 for disclosure of expert witnesses and September 23 for completion of any discovery regarding those experts. (ECF No. 111.) In addition, this court set a deadline of October 26, 2023 for plaintiff’s pretrial statement and November 9 for defendants’ statement. In August 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.