Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20241:19-cv-00068California2,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS TO JUNE 12, 2024

v. DEPOSITION AS MOOT (ECF No. 88) JIMINEZ, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendants. TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (ECF No. 87) 15 I. Introduction Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez, Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, and Hernandez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Pursuant to the Court’s March 22, 2024 order resetting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines, the deadline for completion of all discovery, including filing all motions to compel discovery, is June 21, 2024. (ECF No. 79.) On June 17, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.