Doe
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, also known as T.R.S., No. 2:23-cv-01676-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS, MOTIONS TO DISMISS et al., (Doc. Nos. 45, 46, 47) Defendants.
17 This matter is before the court on three motions to dismiss, one filed by defendant Marriott International Inc. d/b/a Courtyard by Marriott San Jose Campbell (“defendant Marriott”) (Doc. No. 45), one filed by defendants Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (“WHR”), Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. (“DIW”), and Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC (“WHG”) (collectively, “the Wyndham brand defendants”) (Doc. No. 46), and one filed by Vitarag Hospitality, Inc. (“defendant Vitarag”) (Doc. No. 47). All three motions were filed on February 29, 2024, and on March 29, 2024, they were taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 57.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in full…