(SS) Maya v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20241:24-cv-00578California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUBLA JIMENEZ MAYA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00578-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 3) 15 Defendant. FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 16 17 On May 14, 2024, Paubla Jimenez Maya (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of her application for Social Security benefits and an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Upon review of the application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court found that it was inadequate to determine if Plaintiff was entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff was ordered to file a long form application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee in this action within thirty days of May 16, 2024. More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.