Heslop

(PC) Wilkins v. Heslop

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20242:20-cv-01622California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, No. 2:20-cv-01622 DJC DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. HESLOP, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel and the parties’ applications for extensions of time are before the court. Good cause appearing, the requests for extensions of time will be granted as set forth below. Appointment of counsel will be denied. On February 5, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 51.) Briefing on the motion for summary judgment was stayed pending the court’s ruling on motions. (See ECF No. 57.) On June 6, 2024, the court ordered plaintiff to file a written opposition, or statement of opposition, to the pending motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 61.) On June 7, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. (ECF No. 62.) On June 17, 2024, plaintiff sought an extension of time to oppose the motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.