Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20241:19-cv-00068California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. AMEND AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO COMPLETE THE GRIEVANCE

JIMINEZ, et al., PROCESS

Defendants. (ECF No. 91) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 I. Introduction Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez, Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, and Hernandez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On June 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint and a request for 90 days to complete the grievance process. (ECF No. 91.) Defendants have not yet had the opportunity to file a response, but the Court finds that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.