(PC) Khademi v. Superior Court of Placer County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-1860-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF PLACER COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a county prisoner, proceeding without counsel, in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended that this 20 action be dismissed because Plaintiff’s second amended complaint failed to state a potentially 21 colorable claim for relief. (ECF No. 15.) On May 15, 2024, this Court adopted the April 26, 22 2024 findings and recommendations and dismissed this action. (ECF Nos. 18, 19.) 23 On June 5, 2024, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to this Court for 24 the purpose of determining whether Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue for 25 appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see 26 also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma 27 pauperis status…