Harrill

Harrill v. Emanuel Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20242:23-cv-01672California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, et al., No. 1:23-cv-01106-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 LORI BELTRAN, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01670-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO, et al., 21 Defendants. 22 JUDITH HARRILL, No. 2:23-cv-01672-TLN-CKD 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., ORDER 26 Defendants. 27 28 This matter is before the Court on three Motions to Consolidate filed by Defendants in Case No. 1:23-cv-01106-TLN-CKD, (the “Doe case”) (ECF No. 28), Case No. 2:23-cv-01670- TLN-CKD (the “Beltran case”) (ECF No. 36), and Case No. 2:23-cv-01672-TLN-CKD (the “Harrill case”) (ECF No. 34). Plaintiffs filed non-oppositions in Beltran (ECF No. 37) and Harrill (ECF No. 35). Plaintiffs filed an opposition in Doe (ECF No. 33), and Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 35). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions. I. FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.