Puckett

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20242:22-cv-00350California4,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CERTIFICATION OF FACTS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 On June 7, 2024, this action came for hearing before the undersigned on plaintiff’s motion to find defendants in contempt pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 123.) Attorneys Rachel June-Graber and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. (ECF No. 193.) After hearing oral argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. Having considered the parties’ briefing and oral argument, the undersigned orders as follows. BACKGROUND In 2001, plaintiff was convicted of the robbery and murder of Anthony Galati. (ECF No. 36 at 21.) Plaintiff, however, was factually innocent. (Id.) After being incarcerated for more than

27 1 Page number citations such as this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.