(SS) Garmany v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20241:23-cv-00607California4,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SPRING RAY GARMANY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00607-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY

SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 12, 16) Defendant. 17 18 Spring Ray Garmany (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 12, 16-17). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and

1 The Court has substituted Martin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.