(PC) Erakat v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20241:24-cv-00350California1,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AHMAD ERAKAT, No. 1:24-cv-00350-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. (ECF No. 7) DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On April 2, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee or submit an 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff failed to 20 comply with the Court’s order. Therefore, on May 30, 2024, the Court issued an order to show 21 cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has failed to file a response 22 to the order to show cause and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, dismissal of the action 23 is warranted. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. DISCUSSION Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure ... of a party to comply with these Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.