(PC) Mullins v. Tehama County Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20242:23-cv-01832California304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL R. MULLINS, No. 2:23-cv-01832-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

TEHAMA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On March 21, 2024, documents were mailed to plaintiff for service. (ECF No. 5.) The 18 documents were returned to the court on April 12, 2024 as undeliverable. Seventy-three days 19 have passed since the mail was returned and plaintiff has not submitted an updated address. It is 20 the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully 22 effective. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court assign a district judge at random. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.