Quesada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMON QUESADA, Case No. 2:23-cv-311-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 106) MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 106), 18 || and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 19 || 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The 20 || Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over 21 || enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD 22 || Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2017) (noting that 23 || courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective 24 || orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain…