(SS) Ceja v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20241:23-cv-01457California2,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 CAROL FAY ANN CEJA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01457-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 1, 15).

Defendant. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her applications for disability and supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff argues as follows: “The physical RFC assessed by the ALJ is unsupported by substantial evidence.” (ECF No. 15, p. 17). Having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows. Plaintiff argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.