(PC) McDowell v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20241:24-cv-00500California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GIOVANNI MCDOWELL, No. 1:24-cv-00500-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SEND PLAINTIFF COURTESY COPY OF

v. THE COMPLAINT AND COURT’S

SCREENING ORDER AND GRANTING

STEVE SMITH, et al., PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 11)

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on April 26, 2024. 20 On May 23, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claims, 21 and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) 22 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice that he has been transferred to Riverside 23 County Jail on an unrelated criminal case, filed June 24, 2024. Plaintiff submits that was initially 24 told he would be transferred back and forth from Riverside County Jail and California State 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.