Nguyen
(PC) Haro v. Nguyen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 JOHNNY JOE HARO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00448-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE
GRANTED
T. NGUYEN, et al. (ECF Nos. 50, 51). Defendants.
16 17 Plaintiff Johnny Joe Haro is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth 19 Amendment claims against defendants Nguyen, Jeng, and Lai for deliberate indifference to his 20 serious medical needs based on Plaintiff’s allegations that Defendants purposefully failed to address 21 his dental needs. (ECF No. 10). 22 Defendant Dr. Kai-Chin Jeng filed a motion for summary judgment on October 2, 2023, 23 arguing that Dr. Jeng met the applicable standard of care in all respects during the care and 24 treatment rendered to Plaintiff. (ECF No. 50). Defendants Dr. Nguyen and Dr. Lai filed a motion 25 for summary judgment on October 20, 2023, arguing that the undisputed…