Power Business Technology, LLC v. WiZiX Technology Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20242:23-cv-00518California2,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POWER BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY, No. 2:23-cv-00518 AC

LLC,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 WiZiX TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.; GARY JOHNSON; TYLER JOHNSON; BRAD FARNUM; JOSEPH POWER; and DOE Defendants 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 18 This case is before the undersigned for all purposes on the consent of the parties. ECF No. 37. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss and to strike. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff filed two oppositions, separately addressing each portion of defendants’ motion. ECF Nos. 26 (opposing motion to dismiss), 27 (opposing motion to strike). Defendants submitted a reply. ECF No. 29. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are DENIED and the parties are ordered to contact the court to set a date for an Initial Scheduling Conference. I. Background A. The Complaint The operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) asserts federal jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.