Garcia

Garcia v. M.G Luna, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20241:20-cv-00190California4,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIYOSHI GARCIA, et. al., on behalf of Case No. 1:20-cv-00190-KES-HBK the State of California, themselves, and all other similarly situated, CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Plaintiffs, HOLD LUNA DEFENDANTS IN

CONTEMPT AND AWARD ATTORNEY

v. FEES AND COSTS TO PLAINTIFF M.G. LUNA, INC., WESTLAND FARMS, SHOW CAUSE HEARING: AUGUST 2, 2024

LLC, MARIA GUADALUPE LUNA,

MADERA PERSIMMON GROWERS,

INC.,

17 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause why contempt sanctions should not issue against defaulted Defendants, M.G. Luna Inc. and Maria Guadalupe Luna (the “Luna Defendants’) for their failure to timely comply with June 8, 2022 subpoenas duces-tecum and the April 17, 2024 Order by this Court. (Doc. Nos. 50, 58). As

1 Notably, the Luna Defendants are parties to the action. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure distinguish between parties and non-parties in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.