Garcia
Garcia v. M.G Luna, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIYOSHI GARCIA, et. al., on behalf of Case No. 1:20-cv-00190-KES-HBK the State of California, themselves, and all other similarly situated, CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
Plaintiffs, HOLD LUNA DEFENDANTS IN
CONTEMPT AND AWARD ATTORNEY
v. FEES AND COSTS TO PLAINTIFF M.G. LUNA, INC., WESTLAND FARMS, SHOW CAUSE HEARING: AUGUST 2, 2024
LLC, MARIA GUADALUPE LUNA,
MADERA PERSIMMON GROWERS,
INC.,
17 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause why contempt sanctions should not issue against defaulted Defendants, M.G. Luna Inc. and Maria Guadalupe Luna (the “Luna Defendants’) for their failure to timely comply with June 8, 2022 subpoenas duces-tecum and the April 17, 2024 Order by this Court. (Doc. Nos. 50, 58). As
1 Notably, the Luna Defendants are parties to the action. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure distinguish between parties and non-parties in…