Arden

(PC) Harris v. Arden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20241:21-cv-00818California3,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00818-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. Doc. 36 D. ARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris (“Harris” or “plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. This matter proceeds on Harris’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Arden, Gamboa, Garcia, Pasillas and Perez, and First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Arden, Gamboa, Garcia and Pasillas. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on August 21, 2023. Doc. 28. On January 8, 2024, defendants filed a motion to stay these proceedings pending resolution of criminal proceedings in Kings County Superior Court. Doc. 32. The assigned magistrate judge issued an Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case and to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order on January 10, 2024. Doc. 33. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.