Maldonado
Maldonado v. City of Fresno
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20241:24-cv-00102California354 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARISSA MALDONADO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00102-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR
FAILURE TO FILE SCHEDULING
CITY OF FRESNO, REPORT
Defendant. DEADLINE: JUNE 28, 2024
(ECF No. 15)
17 A scheduling conference is set for July 2, 2024 in this matter. (ECF No. 15.) Pursuant to the order continuing the mandatory scheduling conference, the parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling conference. (Id. at 2.) No joint report has been filed in this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that…