Maldonado

Maldonado v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20241:24-cv-00102California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARISSA MALDONADO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00102-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO FILE SCHEDULING

CITY OF FRESNO, REPORT

Defendant. DEADLINE: JUNE 28, 2024

(ECF No. 15)

17 A scheduling conference is set for July 2, 2024 in this matter. (ECF No. 15.) Pursuant to the order continuing the mandatory scheduling conference, the parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling conference. (Id. at 2.) No joint report has been filed in this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.