Bandaru

(PC) Kelly v. Bandaru

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20242:24-cv-01161California373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01161-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER BANDARU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 30, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The Court observes that this procedure is sufficient to constitute notice to the Plaintiff of the potential disqualification under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) as required by Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1120. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.