Hixon
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY TELLEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00402 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT
v. BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
K. HIXSON, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, PROOF OF
EXHAUSTION DUE JULY 11, 2024 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint. ECF No. 1. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why this matter should not be summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this action. In the alternative, he…