(PC) Andrew v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
20 On May 6, 2024, this Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 35.) Specifically, 21 the Court determined that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleged cognizable Eighth 22 Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants Barnes, Beaudreau, Bennett, Cervantes, 23 Ceja, Ciolli, Dewilde, Heldman, Haslett, Lopez, Lyons, McClure, Schaffer, Scott, Simpson, 24 Vandenover, and Zaragoza, as well as cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to 25 serious medical needs claims against Defendants Palenteghi and Spheres; however, it failed to 26 allege any other cognizable claim against any other named defendant. (Id. at 5-17.) Plaintiff was 27 directed to do one of the following within 21 days: (1) to notify the Court in writing that she did Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants Barnes, Beaudreau, Bennett, Cervantes, Ceja, Ciolli, Dewilde, Heldman, Haslett, Lopez, Lyons, McClure, Schaffer, Scott, Simpson, Vandenover, and Zaragoza, and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Palenteghi and Spheres; the remaining claims against any defendant to be dismissed; or (2)…