Estate of Derek Valentine v. County of Merced
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20241:23-cv-01697California736 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ESTATE OF DEREK VALENTINE, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01697-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
EITHER FILE A NOTICE OF
v. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS
OR A NOTICE INFORMING COURT WHY
COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., MOTIONS ARE NOT MOOT
Defendants. FIVE DAY DEADLINE
16 On February 9, 2024, Defendant CFMG filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 14.) On February 23, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to Defendant CFMG’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 19.) On February 28, 2024, Defendants County of Merced, Merced County Sheriff’s Office, and Vernon Warnke filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 20.) The motions were referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF Nos. 17, 21.) On March 4, 2024, Defendant CMCG filed a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 23.) On March 5, 2024, Plaintiff’s filed an opposition to County Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 24.) On March 15, 2024, the County…