Estate of Derek Valentine v. County of Merced

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20241:23-cv-01697California736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF DEREK VALENTINE, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01697-JLT-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

EITHER FILE A NOTICE OF

v. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS

OR A NOTICE INFORMING COURT WHY

COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., MOTIONS ARE NOT MOOT

Defendants. FIVE DAY DEADLINE

16 On February 9, 2024, Defendant CFMG filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 14.) On February 23, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to Defendant CFMG’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 19.) On February 28, 2024, Defendants County of Merced, Merced County Sheriff’s Office, and Vernon Warnke filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 20.) The motions were referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF Nos. 17, 21.) On March 4, 2024, Defendant CMCG filed a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 23.) On March 5, 2024, Plaintiff’s filed an opposition to County Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 24.) On March 15, 2024, the County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.