AquAlliance

AquAlliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20241:20-cv-00878California1,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AQUALLIANCE, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00878−JLT-EPG

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUESTING ADDITIONAL

BRIEFING RE MOOTNESS

13 v.

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF

RECLAMATION, et al.,

Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs in this case challenge a five-year program (2020-2024) designed to allow sellers located upstream of the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta (“Delta”) to sell/transfer water to willing buyers south of the Delta (the “Project”). Claims in the case arise under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and California’s Public Trust Doctrine. Currently pending before the Court are highly complex cross-motions for summary judgment challenging the September 2019 Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Long Term Water Transfer Project (LTWT EIS/R) prepared under CEQA and NEPA as well as the related biological opinion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.