(PS) Stevens v. County of Neveda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERAMY MICHAEL STEVENS, No. 2:23-cv-01830-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF NEVADA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jeramy Michael Stevens proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis.1 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and third amended complaint (entitled second) are before the court. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) The court construes plaintiff’s filing of the third amended complaint as a motion to amend the complaint. Given the liberal pleading standards afforded to plaintiff as a pro se litigant and the procedural posture of the case, leave to file the third amended complaint is granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The third amended complaint (entitled second) (ECF No. 13) is the operative pleading. The third amended complaint fails to state a claim. Because it clearly appears plaintiff will be unable to state a claim based on the relevant facts, the third amended complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend.…