Rivera

(PC) Porter v. Rivera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20241:24-cv-00599California1,407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUMPTER PORTER, No. 1:24-cv-00599-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION LAQUIN RIVERA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

16 (ECF No. 11) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed June 17, 2024. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.