Hugh

(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20241:24-cv-00655California2,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’ANNUNZIO ROMAN GAVIOLA No. 1:24-cv-00655-SAB (PC)

PATRON,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Plaintiff, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEWY HUGH, et al., RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION PROCEED ONLY ON THE DUE PROCESS

CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No. 8)

19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed June 21, 2024. 22 I.

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 26 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 27 “frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.