Marsh
Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01451-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING RETURNED
SERVICE DOCUMENTS
v. (ECF No. 17) FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant.
17 Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 7, 9). On January 25, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiffs’ first amended 19 complaint, and concluded that they stated a claim against Defendant Freedom Mortgage 20 Corporation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. (ECF No. 10). 21 The Court directed Plaintiffs to complete and return service documents (ECF No. 11) to 22 serve Defendant, which Plaintiffs did (ECF No. 12), and on February 6, 2024, the Court directed 23 the United States Marshals Service to serve the documents on Defendant. (ECF No. 13). On April 24 16, 2024, the United States Marshals Service filed the process receipt and return showing that 25 Defendant was not served because it was unable to locate the Defendant at the address provided. 26 (ECF No. 14). The handwritten…