Ayodale
Smith v. Ayodale
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00538-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION MERCY AYODALE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Defendants. (Doc. 6)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (Doc. 1.) For the reasons that follow, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and for lack of jurisdiction. I. Background Plaintiff initiated this action on May 6, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On May 23, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and determined that the complaint failed to comply with the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to allege this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Court granted Plaintiff leave…