Crozier
Crozier v. Valley Health Team, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. CROZIER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00255-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT VALLEY HEALTH TEAM, INC., et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mark A. Crozier (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on February 29, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On May 2, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on May 28, 2024, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 5.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief…