Bowers

Bowers v. City of Porterville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20241:23-cv-01483California3,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK K. BOWERS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01483-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CITY OF PORTERVILLE, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 12)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark K. Bowers (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on October 17, 2023, against Defendants City of Porterville; Porterville Police Department (“PPD”); Officer Jarid Skiles; Lieutenant Richard Standridge; State of California, Tulare County District Attorney’s Office Porterville Branch; Alexander Cho; Jonathan Juanez; Ariana Luna; and Jesus Luna III. (ECF No. 1.) A screening order issued on May 9, 2024, finding Plaintiff’s complaint failed to comply with Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and failed to comply with the applicable statutes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.