Rodriguez

(PC) Howard v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20241:24-cv-00285California4,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-00285-SAB (PC)

HOWARD,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Plaintiff, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AYLANA OLIVIA PARKS, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. (ECF No. 12) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed June 20, 2024. (ECF No. 12.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.