Elliott

Elliott v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20242:23-cv-01417California3,700 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LILLIAN ELLIOTT, on behalf of herself No. 2:23-cv-01417-MCE-AC and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 Through this class action, Plaintiff Lillian Elliott (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, seeks relief from Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc. (“Defendant”) arising from the labeling and sale of “Smart Balance Original” buttery spread products (“the Product”). Plaintiff’s Complaint sets forth the following causes of action: (1) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750, et seq.; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), ECF Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq., Unlawful and Unfair Prongs; (3) Violations of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et seq.; (4) Breach of Express Warranty; (5) Breach of Implied Warranty; (6) Negligent Misrepresentation; (7)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.