McLeod

McLeod v. City of Redding

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:22-cv-00585California2,798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ----oo0oo----

VERONICA MCLEOD, individually No. 2:22-cv-00585 WBS JDP and as successor in interest to decedent, DOLORES

HERNANDEZ; AMADO HERNANADEZ;

individually and as successor in interest to decedent, DOLORES HERNANDEZ; and YSIDRA REGALDO, individually,

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER

Plaintiffs, 17 v.

CITY OF REDDING; GARRETT

MAXWELL, an individual; MATTHEW BRUCE, an individual; and DOES 2-10, inclusive,

Defendants. 22 ----oo0oo---- A Final Pretrial Conference was held in this matter, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 282, on July 1, 2024. Stewart Katz appeared as counsel for plaintiffs and Dale L. Allen, Jr., 28 appeared as counsel for defendants. Following the conference, the court enters this Final Pretrial Order: I. Jurisdiction – Venue Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a), because plaintiffs assert a claim for violation of constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.