Tibbet

(PC) Warfield v. Tibbet

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:23-cv-01546California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

OSI IOI III OEE III OO OE

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Broderick James Warfield, No. 2:23-cv-01546-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. walt Tibet, et al., Defendants. 16 This court previously adopted the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend and entered judgment. See generally Findings & Recommendations, ECF No. 15; Order (June 5, 2024), ECF No. 51. Plaintiff moves 20 for reconsideration of that order, seeks the appomtment of a special master, moves to supplement the record, and requests permission to use more pages than ordinarily permitted by the local rules. 22 See generally Mot. Recons., ECF No. 54; Mot. Appoint Special Master, ECF No. 56; Mot. Suppl., ECF No. 57; Mot. Expand Page Limits, ECF No. 58. Plaintiff contends in his motion for reconsideration that this court clearly erred by failing to consider the brief filed at ECF No. 50. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.