Arisco

(PC) Loftis v. Arisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20241:22-cv-01266California1,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARQUISE DEANGELO LOFTIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01266-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF

REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

ARISCO, et al., DOCUMENTS (ECF No. 41) Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND

DEADLINE TO FILE PRE-TRIAL

EXHAUSTION MOTION

(ECF No. 42)

Discovery Response Deadline: August 5, 2024 Exhaustion Motion Deadline: August 30, 2024 15 I. Introduction Plaintiff Marquise DeAngelo Loftis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Rosales Murillo,1 Tienda, Diaz, and Navarro (collectively, “Defendants”) for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.