(PS) Crocker v. County of Amador

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:22-cv-01924California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMINE CROCKER, No. 2:22-cv-1924-DJC-AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 7, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations that were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 43.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. The Court disagrees with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Plaintiff has failed to plausibly establish excessive force. While the transcripts of the court proceedings cited in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.