Dhillon

Dhillon v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20241:23-cv-00416California2,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDEEP SINGH DHILLON, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00416-KES-CDB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT IN PART DEFENDANT WILLIAM

v. EDWARDS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF

DEFAULT AND TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

WILLIAM EDWARDS, et al. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Defendants. (Doc. 15)

16 14-DAY DEADLINE 17

Pending before the Court is Defendant William Edwards’ (“Edwards”) motion to set aside the

entry of defaults and to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, filed May 3, 2023. (Doc. 15). Plaintiffs Randeep Singh Dhillon, Pinder Singh, Gurpreet Singh, and Balwinder Singh (hereinafter collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to the motion on May 17, 2023. (Doc. 25). That same day, Plaintiffs Pinder Singh and Randeep Singh Dhillon filed declarations in opposition to the motion. (Docs. 23-24). For the reasons set forth herein, the Undersigned will recommend Defendant Edwards’ motion to set aside entry of defaults…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.