Mejia

(PC) Bailey v. Mejia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20241:23-cv-01631California1,707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND BAILEY, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-1631 JLT EPG (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR RECONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO v. ) RULE 60 ) R. MEJIA, et al., ) (Doc. 18) ) Defendants. ) )

Raymond Bailey asserted he suffered violations of his rights arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Eighth Amendment while incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, Corcoran. (Doc. 12.) The Court found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim— despite the Court previously providing the relevant legal standards and granting leave to amend—and dismissed the amended complaint without further leave to amend. (Doc. 16.) The Court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case, and entered judgment on May 24, 2024. (Docs. 16, 17.) Plaintiff now seeks relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 18.) For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.