Osman

(PC) Diaz v. Osman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20242:23-cv-01449California883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:23-cv-01449-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

M. OSMAN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 1, 12) 16 Plaintiff Miguel Enrique Diaz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 20, 2023, plaintiff initiated this action by filing a motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 1), which the assigned magistrate judge also construed as the operative complaint. On January 12, 2024, the magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that it lacked organization, appeared to join unrelated claims, was unclear as to which defendants were named and which claims were brought against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.