Andes
(HC) Popke v. Andes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS LOUIS POPKE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00779-EPG-HC
Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE CHANCE ANDES, JUDICIAL REMEDIES Respondent.
16 Petitioner Douglas Louis Popke is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. DISCUSSION Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. A petitioner in state custody who is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus…