(PC) Spears v. El Dorado County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20242:15-cv-00165California1,922 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SPEARS, No. 2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER EL DORRADO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county and current state prisoner proceeding pro se. Currently before the court is defendants El Dorado County, Handy, and Garcia’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 114. Also before the court are plaintiff’s motions for sanctions. ECF No. 128-130. I. Procedural History This action proceeds on the second amended complaint. ECF No. 33. On screening, the court found that Claims Four and Eleven stated cognizable claims against El Dorado County, Claim Six stated a cognizable claim against defendant Armstrong, Claim Seven stated a claim for relief against defendants Garcia and Handy, and Claim Nine stated a claim for relief against defendant Kurk. ECF No. 38. All other claims and defendants were dismissed. ECF No. 44. //// 27 Defendant Kurk was identified in the complaint as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.