Munoz

Munoz v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20241:24-cv-00540California987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BRYAN MUNOZ, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00540-KES-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND v. (Doc. 11) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiffs Bryan Munoz, Maritsa Molina, Jerry Munoz-Molina, Gerardo Munoz, and Angelene Munoz-Molina move to remand this action to Tulare County Superior Court, arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Motion to Remand (“Motion”), Doc. 11. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Services have been dismissed from this action and the remaining defendants have not filed an opposition to the motion to remand. Doc. 13; see Docket. This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons explained below, the motion to remand this action to Tulare County Superior Court is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Bryan Munoz alleges he was injured when he fell on a pile of hot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.