(PC) Tamrat v. CA Health Care Facility-Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERMAN TAMRAT, No. 2:23-CV-0313-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER DOE, et al., Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
19 On May 22, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of 21 this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local 22 Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. 23 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 24 See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 25 Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 26 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its own docket; (3) the risk…