(PS) Beasley v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20242:23-cv-00326California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACY BEASLEY, No. 2:23-cv-00326-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER

TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL

INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Tracy Beasley has filed the instant request for a six-month continuance, (ECF No. 38), which the Court construes as a Motion for Administrative Relief as defined by Local Rule 233. Since this case was removed to this Court over one year ago, Plaintiff has sought to stay or continue the case five times either to allow Plaintiff time to secure legal counsel or because of medical issues. (See ECF Nos. 11, 12, 14, 36 and 38.) Most recently, on May 22, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a sixty (60) day extension of time to retain counsel following the withdraw of her previous counsel due to Plaintiff’s medical issues. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff’s instant request, however, does not seek the extension of any particular deadline, but instead seeks what is effectively a stay of the case for the next…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.